The pedestal structure, ELM losses and linear MHD stability are analysed in a series of JET-ILW H and D type I ELMy H-mode plasmas. The pedestal pressure (pPED) is typically higher in D than in H at the same input power, with the difference mainly due to lower density in H than in D. At the same input power, the pedestal electron pressure gradient is typically lower in H than in D at similar pedestal pressure width. The neutral penetration model is in contradiction with the narrower (or similar) pedestal density width in H than in D. The ELM energy losses are found to be dominated by density loss both in H and D. At low ELM frequency (fELM), ELM particle losses increase with fELM, in correlation with decreasing pedestal top density (ne,PED). Thus, the observed higher fELM in H than in D at same input power possibly contributes to the lower ne,PED in H. However, ELM particle losses saturate at higher fELM, both in H and in D, implying that other mechanisms such as pedestal transport may also play a role in the lower ne,PED in H. The direct isotope effect on pedestal stability, calculated with the ideal MHD HELENA/ELITE codes, is found to be small and thus cannot explain the difference in pPED between H and D. Interpretative EDGE2D/EIRENE simulations with simultaneous upstream and outer divertor target profile constraints indicate higher separatrix temperature in H than in D for a pair of discharges at similar stored energy (which required higher input power in H than in D). This in turn translates into significant destabilisation of Peeling-Ballooning modes in H compared to D, which is consistent with type I ELMs being triggered at lower pedestal pressure in H.
Isotope dependence of the type I ELMy H-mode pedestal in JET-ILW Hydrogen and Deuterium plasmasIsotope dependence of the type I ELMy H-mode pedestal in JET-ILW Hydrogen and Deuterium plasmas https://scientific-publications.ukaea.uk/wp-content/themes/blade/images/empty/thumbnail.jpg 150 150 UKAEA Opendata https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c7700c5c020bdaef41f283eb9cb3b887?s=96&d=mm&r=g
The published version of this paper is currently under embargo and will be available on 09/03/2022